Aslam babalal desai v. state of maharashtra
WebJun 8, 2024 · – The Supreme Court of India in Suresh Jain v. the State of Maharashtra. Case Studies • Aslam Babalal Desai v. the State Of Maharashtra dated 15 September 1992. Any individual convicted cannot under any circumstances be imprisoned for more than a day (24 hours). This is by section 57 of the code. WebSep 15, 1992 · Petitioner: Aslam Babalal Desai. Respondent: State of Maharashtra. …
Aslam babalal desai v. state of maharashtra
Did you know?
WebNov 24, 1994 · On 18-6-2003 an application for cancellation of bail was filed by the State of Maharashtra under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Proced...and learned Single Judge ... Aslam Babalal Desai v. State Of Maharashtra . 6. Court: Supreme Court Of India. Date: Sep 15, 1992. Cited By ... WebThe following observations made by the Apex Court in Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra, (1992) 4 SCC 272: (1992 Cr.L.J.3712) in the context of compulsive bail under the proviso to Section 167(2) are apt even in the context of Section 437(6) of the Code: "15. Even where two views are possible, this being a matter belonging to the field ...
http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/aslam-babalal-desai-vs-state-of-maharashtra WebSep 15, 1992 · After the charge-sheet was submitted and the documents were tendered …
WebAslam Babalal Desai vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 September, 1992. Showing the … WebMay 11, 2024 · It is settled law, as was held in the matter of: Aslam Babalal Desai V/s State of Maharashtra, AIR 1993 SC 1, that once an accused is released on bail under Section 167 (2) of the Cr.P.C. then he ...
WebThat is because cancellation of bail interferes with the liberty already secured by the accused 18 (2004) 2 SCC 362. 19 Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra (1992) 4 SCC 272 at 289-90, para 11. 20 Ibid. Also see, Nityanand Rai v. State of Bihar (2005) 4 SCC 178; Mehboob Dawood Shaikh v.
WebASLAM BABALAL DESAI V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA The Supreme Court held that once a persons’ liberty has been interfered with with his arrest without a court’s order or a warrant, the investigation must be carried out with utmost urgency and completed within the maximum period allowed under the Criminal Procedure Code. huish trustWebNov 4, 2024 · 19 Aslam Babalal Desai v. S tate of Maharashtra (1992) 4 SCC 272 at 289-90 ... (1978) 2 SCC 411. Also see, Mahmood Dawood Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra. Jan 2004; 2-362; State; State (Delhi ... holiday inn times square expediaWebAslam Babalal Desai vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 September, 1992. Equivalent citations: AIR 1993 SC 1, 1993 (1) ALT Cri 265, 1993 (41) BLJR 75, 1992 CriLJ 3712, JT 1992 (6) SC 21, 1992 (2) SCALE 523, (1992) 4 SCC 272, 1992 Supp 1 SCR 545 ... In … huish webmailWebJan 17, 2024 · Referring to judgments of the Apex Court, particularly in Aslam Babalal … huis huis cape townWebAslam Babalal Desai, Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra, Respondent. Criminal … holiday inn times square expressWebJun 8, 2024 · – The Supreme Court of India in Suresh Jain v. the State of Maharashtra. … huish theaterWebNov 24, 1994 · The bail once granted cannot and ought not to be normally cancelled in a mechanical manner unless there are cogent and overwhelming facts and circumstances on record to do...bail in the case of Aslam Babalal Desai v. State Of Maharashtra. (AIR 1993 SC 1).The petitioner has neither pleaded nor proved any one or more of the ... hui shuttlecock kicking